The Squeee banner with lots of pictures of things I enjoy


Currently Reading

From the Past

Films on the to-do list

  • Black Widow
  • Chimes at Midnight
  • Den blomstertid nu kommer (backed!)
  • Jojo Rabbit
  • The Killing of a Sacred Deer
  • Last Christmas
  • MIB: International
  • Remember Sunday
  • Shazam! 2
  • Spy Guys
  • Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri
  • Wonder Woman: 1984

Downton Abbey: Series 1 (2010)

TV series review: Downton Abbey: Series 1 (2010), written by Julian Fellowes

This is very much overdue, but never the less, good things come to those who wait, as they say.

Beginning in 1912 Yorkshire, we meet the grand estate of Downton Abbey, where the Earl of Grantham, Robert Crawley (Hugh Bonneville) and his family gets the tragic news of the sinking of the RMS Titanic. On it was the man next in line to inherit Downton, who was also set to marry the oldest daughter (the Earl has three daughters, none are allowed to inherit the title and estate), and now, the future of the family and their ancestral home is uncertain.

A distant relative is found – young Matthew Crawley (Dan Stevens), a lowly solicitor in Manchester. He finds the whole idea of becoming Earl very alien to him, but he does take a shine to the oldest daughter Mary (Michelle Dockery) …

Downton Abbey is set both above and below stairs. Above is the Crawley family, with the Earl, the Countess (Elizabeth McGovern), daughters Mary, Edith (Laura Carmichael) and Sybil (Jessica Brown Findlay); there’s the Dowager Countess (Maggie Smith), who doesn’t get along with Matthew’s mother (Penelope Wilton).

Downstairs, the house is run by Carson (Jim Carter) and Mrs Hughes (Phyllis Logan), with Mrs Patmore (Lesley Nichol) in the kitchen. There’s the kind Anna (Joanne Froggatt) and equally kind William (Thomas Howes), with their polar opposites O’Brien (Siobhan Finneran) and Thomas (Rob James-Collier). The kitchen maid Daisy (Sophie McShera) is new on the job and eager to learn, if not very skilled. The latest addition to the household, John Bates (Brendan Coyle), is controversial – whoever heard of a limp valet? Especially not since Thomas was after his job …

When I heard of this show originally, I wanted to see it just because of the period setting. When I started watching, I thought it was magnificent. Both sides (floors?) get lots of time to develop their characters, and both have sympathetic and unsympathetic characters.

My favourites downstairs are … so many. Anna and Mr Bates, for instance, what a darling couple! William is such a nice lad, and Daisy is so adorably naive and gullible. Upstairs, I really like Matthew and the Earl, and find the Dowager Countess hilarious. Of the three sisters, I probably prefer Sybil – she’s the rebellious one. Mary and Edith are too backstabby with each other. (Like the bit around Robert Bathurst’s guest character. That’s not on. It’s no way to treat your sister, even if she had been a bitch to you.)

The costumes are fantastic, the setting (Highclere Castle) is lovely, the story engaging and everything’s just so darn watchable. Yes, it’s not full on action and things that go WHIZZ!! BANG!! CLANG!! all the time – it’s a slower pace, and you get time to get involved in the characters’ lives. The actors get time to act, and do it so well. All in all, it’s thought through, and while it might be an era seen through rose-tinted glasses, it’s still good old-fashioned storytelling at its very best.

Fortunately, the series became insanely popular, and a second series was on last year – a third one is expected later this year. I. Can’t. Wait!

5 out of 5 slippery soaps.

Traxy Thornfield

A Swedish introvert residing in Robin Hood Country (Nottingham, UK) with a husband and two cats. She's an eager participant in tabletop and play-by-post roleplaying, woodworking, photography and European travel. Will get a novel out one of these days, if she doesn't get too distracted along the way.

6 thoughts on “Downton Abbey: Series 1 (2010)

  1. I heartily agree with everything you’ve said! I was also pleasantly surprised by how much I enjoyed Joanne Froggatt’s role here, as I disliked her intensely in Robin Hood. Now that I know she is a good actress, it makes me wonder at the direction she received in RH and especially the writing of her character Kate!

    1. Oh, I agree. Kate was absolutely awful, but Anna is great and I liked Joanne Froggatt when she was in “Moving On” as well, so definitely not a problem with the actress … just that annoying character in “Robin Hood”!

Leave a reply - comment is free (sort of)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: